Legal Opinion

Doe v. Attorney General

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1992No. Docket 113775PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holbrook, Jr., P.J.

In this action for a declaratory interpretation of the Surrogate Parenting Act, MCL 722.851 et seq.; MSA 25.248(151) et seq., plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of the Wayne Circuit Court granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition for failure to state a claim. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiffs are infertile couples and prospective surrogate mothers. In their suit, filed on August 4, 1988, plaintiffs assert that if the Surrogate Parenting Act were interpreted as being an outright ban on surrogacy contracts for pay, the statute would deny them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Matter of Baby M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. People v. HowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re BabyTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Soos v. SUPERIOR CT. COUNTY OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. People v. GreggMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. West Bloomfield Charter Township v. KarchonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. J.F. v. D.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API