Legal Opinion

Miller v. Armstrong-Landon Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1913No. 8,010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court; William C. Purdum, Judge. Action by the Armstrong-Landon Company against Henrietta Miller and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Shea, J. —

Suit by appellee to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against appellants, Henrietta Miller and Charles G. Miller. Appellant, John ~W. Tash, was made a party to the action to answer as to any interest he might have or claim in the property subject to the lien. The complaint was in four paragraphs, to each of which appellant’s separate demurrers were overruled. Answer in general denial. Appellant Tash filed a cross-complaint against Miller and Miller to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against them on an account he claimed was owing him by Charles G. Miller, which was answered in general denial.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Board of Commissioners v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Saunders v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kelso v. KelsoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Elrod v. PurleeIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Berne Hardware Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Abernathy v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API