Legal Opinion

Abernathy v. Peterson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

— This action was brought by respondent to foreclose thirty-two liens. The complaint contains thirty-two causes of action, the first being based upon the individual lien of respondent and the remaining thirty-one upon claims of lien assigned to respondent. The defendants Peterson and Elmquist appeared and filed general and special demurrers to the complaint, which were overruled. Upon their failure to answer within the time allowed by the court their default was entered. Appellant also filed general and special demurrers. The general demurrer was overruled. The special demurrer was sustained…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Busenbarke v. RameyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Wolverton v. WolvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Phillips v. Salmon River Mining & Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dybvig v. WillisIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Diamond National Corporation v. Dale Lee, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Lus v. PecararoIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gem State Lumber Co. v. Union Grain & Elevator Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Billings v. Missoula White Pine Sash Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API