Legal Opinion

City of Jackson v. Wickline

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2003No. 02CA8PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Judge.

{¶ 1} The Municipal Court of Jackson County found James A. Wickline guilty of telephone harassment, a violation of Jackson City Ordinance Section 537.11. Wickline contends that the trial court erred in failing to hold a hearing before it made a redetermination of his eligibility for court-appointed counsel, and in failing to properly record any such hearing or waiver of the right to counsel. Because Wickline claimed that he was unable to obtain counsel, the trial court was required to conduct a hearing, making a “full inquiry” into Wickline’s ability to obtain counsel.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. State v. TymcioOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. HaagOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DownieOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. Wilkerson, 06ca749 (1-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. KaslerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. OgleOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API