Legal Opinion
Dittmore-Freimuth Corp. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 16, 1968No. 182-64PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SKELTON, Judge.
Plaintiff, by this action, seeks an equitable adjustment for additional costs it incurred in the performance of four contracts 1 entered into with the defendant for the manufacture of rocket launcher adapters 2 and spare parts. The adapter was designed for attachment to a rocket launcher (hereinafter referred to as the combo) in order to adapt the combo for the launching of sub-caliber rockets from naval aircraft.
More particularly, plaintiff alleges that the Government did in fact and in law authorize or compel changes in the applicable drawings and performance…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Shea v. Bay State Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.