Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by The Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, from an order of the District Court of Mower County, Farmer, J., made February 13, 1892, refusing a new trial. Donald J. Cameron owned a farm of four hundred and" forty-five acres in Mower County. Two lines of railroad operated by the appellant had been constructed across this farm and the right of way for each acquired. One of these runs north and south and is called the “Iowa and Minnesota Division.”

Read the full summary

Appeal by The Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, from an order of the District Court of Mower County, Farmer, J., made February 13, 1892, refusing a new trial. Donald J. Cameron owned a farm of four hundred and" forty-five acres in Mower County. Two lines of railroad operated by the appellant had been constructed across this farm and the right of way for each acquired. One of these runs north and south and is called the “Iowa and Minnesota Division.” The other runs east and west, and is called the “Southern Minnesota Division.” These two lines cross each other on the farm, at a…

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing a new trial, after a verdict for plaintiff on the second trial of an appeal from the award of commissioners in proceedings to condemn land for railway purposes. The principal facts, except such as bear upon the defendant’s rights in and to the strip of land extending east and west, and used for the line of the Southern Minnesota division, appear in the opinion heretofore rendered on a former appeal, 42 Minn. 75, (43 N. W. Rep. 785,) and the alleged errors now presented for review pertain solety to portions of the charge to the jury.

For the sake of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bazille v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Cameron v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Doyle v. HallamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ranck v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. State v. CaseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Board of County Com'rs of Roosevelt County v. GoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API