Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe district court for Mower county, Farmer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $2,700 for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, J.1

This is an appeal from an order refusing a new trial, the cause having been tried in the district court upon an appeal from the award of commissioners in proceedings to condemn land for railroad purposes. The land of the respondent consisted of a farm, of 455 acres in Mower county. Long prior to this condemnation two. lines of railroad, operated by the appellant, had been established across the farm, and the right of way therefor acquired. One of these runs-in a north and south direction, and is called the “Iowa & Minnesota Division” of the appellant’s road. The other, running…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Peck v. Superior Short Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Blake v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. Sherwood v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. v. Xavier Realty, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railroad v. AubuchonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. State v. Bradshaw Land & Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Stuhl v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Hoyt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API