Legal Opinion

State v. Casey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1962No. 38,426PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court which denied the motion of the appellant, State of Minnesota, for a new trial.

This case involves the condemnation for highway purposes of a strip of land owned by respondent Mapco Sand & Gravel Company. Prior to this action Mapco was the fee owner of 75.58 acres of land running along Xerxes Avenue in Edina and Bloomington. The tract was divided by West 78th Street (Highway No. 100), the right-of-way for which had been acquired by the state in 1926. That right-of-way varied from 80 to 110 feet in width, and the paved…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. State v. ElliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Gibson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API