Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Pritzker
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Judson P. Going, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
This writ of error is to reverse a judgment' of the Municipal Court of Chicago in a suit of the fourth class, tried therefore without written pleadings, except a bill of particulars. That bill alleges, that the plaintiff’s claim was for goods and merchandise sold and delivered from May 7, 1900, to June 30, 1900.
The case was tried by the court without a jury, and resulted in the judgment for the defendant in error, the plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, the defendant below, for $841.89, which it is here sought, to reverse. The suit was begun on July 3, 1907, and the defense was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kallenbach v. DickinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Keener v. CrullIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Carroll v. ForsythIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Holland v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Boone v. A'HernAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Donnell v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Schmidt v. DesserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Mattison-Greenlee Service Corp. v. CulhaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Meyer v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- West Publishing Co. v. LasleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.