Schmidt v. Desser
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon
An agreement deferring the payment of an unliquidated sum owed to the plaintiff did not fix the amount due. When the plaintiff brought suit on the underlying debt, the statute of limitations had already run. Because the oral agreement deferring the payment did not fix a definite amount that the debtor owed, it did not toll the statute.
On April 20,1965, Frank A. Schmidt, the plaintiff, sued Keith Desser and several of Desser’s business corporations on an oral employment agreement. Schmidt sought an accounting and a money judgment. Between the time of filing and 1972 the suit was dismissed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Keener v. CrullIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Nogle v. NogleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Tassin v. Allstate Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Neish v. GannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Schmidt v. PfauIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pantoja v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Axia, Inc. v. I. C. Harbour Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Estate of Teall v. NeitzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Rubin and Norris, LLC v. PanzarellaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
- P-K Tool & Mfg. Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.