Legal Opinion

Holland v. Martin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGray, C. J.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The defendant, in his answer to the merits, pleaded that before the commencement of this action the defendant was duly adjudged a bankrupt, that the debt sued upon was provable and proved in bankruptcy, and would be barred by a certificate of discharge, ,and that the proceedings in bankruptcy were still pending.

At the trial before the Chief Justice of the Superior Court, without a jury, there was no dispute as to the correctness of the plaintiff’s claim; the defendant proved the allegations of his answer, except that it appeared that the claim had not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doe v. ChildressSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Cutter v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Ray v. WightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Dunbar v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Wills v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allard v. EstesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Rosenthal v. NoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Gray v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Cohen v. Industrial Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Reed v. PaulMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API