Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Altman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1966No. 40828PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Vice Chief Justice.

In the trial court, plaintiffs, Phillips and wife, sued defendants, Altman, et al., for damages arising because of the pollution of plaintiffs’ southwest quarter of a section of land by crude oil and other deleterious substances which defendants allegedly permitted to escape from oil leases owned and operated by defendants on the adjacent southeast quarter of said section.

Defendants’ answer was a general denial with an affirmative allegation that in the conveyance by which plaintiffs acquired title to their lands there appeared the following language:

“Said parties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wilcox v. WickizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. MacKey v. AycockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Exchange Drilling Co. v. RingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 1515-1519 LAKEVIEW v. Apartment Sales Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. MARTIN v. PHILLIPSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  3. 1515-1519 Lakeview Boulevard Condominium Ass'n v. Apartment Sales Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. STATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API