Legal Opinion
Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 9, 1991No. CIV-90-723-RPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
Before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) and Citation Oil & Gas Corporation (“Citation”). Defendants assert that releases and easements entered into by Mobil’s predecessor in interest and Plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest bar Plaintiffs’ claims.
There are numerous reasons why these motions for summary judgment must be and are denied.
At all pertinent times, that is, both when the releases and easements were executed and as of the date Plaintiffs’ Complaint was filed through the present,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Steele v. DrummondSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Shepard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Corbett v. Combined Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- TCA Building Co. v. Northwestern Resources Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
- Elsken v. Network Multi-Family Security Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Hedback v. American Family Mutual Insurance (In Re Mathews)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Boland v. King County Medical Blue ShieldDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1992
- Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.