Legal Opinion

MacKey v. Aycock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 1921No. 10252PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Bryan County: Jesse'M. Hatchett, Judge. Action by J. F. Mackey against Jack Ay-cock and Jesse Womack to enjoin obstruction of public bigbway. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, for the purpose of enjoining the obstruction of a public highway. Upon trial to the court there was a judgment in favor of the defendants denying the relief prayed for, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

From the findings of fact of the trial court, to which no exceptions were filed by any of the parties, it appears the road in controversy was a public highway upon which the plaintiff’s lands abutted, and that the same was obstructed by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Venard v. CrossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. McKay v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Martin v. MarksIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Strunk v. PritchettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Hayden v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Drane v. AveryArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Blanding v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Thomas v. FarrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Phillips v. AltmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API