Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Miguel Palafox-Mazon Carlos Gamboa-Miranda Ramon Garcia-Montijo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2000No. 99-10026PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendants/Appellees Juan Miguel Pala-fox-Mazon, Carlos Gamboa-Miranda, and Ramon Garcia-Montijo backpacked into the United States carrying approximately 47 pounds of marijuana each and were arrested in Arizona by the U.S. Border Patrol. After the government dismissed the conspiracy charge against them, each Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). At sentencing, the district court found that the Defendants had not “jointly undertaken criminal activity” within the meaning of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OgbuehiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. DallmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ramon Hernandez-Guardado,defendant-Appellant. United States of America v. Dario Jimenez-FriasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Juan Rodrigo Gamez-Orduno, Jose Martinez-Carra, Jesus Martinez-VillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Vicente Roberto JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.