Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramon Hernandez-Guardado,defendant-Appellant. United States of America v. Dario Jimenez-Frias
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2000No. 99-10342, 99-10480PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a person who knowingly transports an illegal alien in the United States but does so in the course of his employment lacks the mens rea necessary to support a conviction for transportation of an illegal alien. Ramon Hernandez-Guardado (“Hernandez-Guardado”) and his codefendant, Dario Jimenez-Frias (“Jimenez-Frias”), appeal from convictions imposed after jury trial for transporting an illegal alien and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii) and (A)(v)(II), and conspiracy to transport illegal aliens, in violation of §…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine KhamisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. David L. Smith, United States of America v. Herbert A. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Adalberto GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Robin Sidney SayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.