Legal Opinion
United States v. Vicente Roberto Jimenez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 2001No. 00-10343PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASNIK, District Judge:
Vicente Roberto Jimenez appeals his sentence of 70 months imprisonment entered pursuant to a guilty plea to a single count of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (Illegal Reentry). Jimenez contends that the district court plainly erred in concluding that he had committed a prior aggravated felony. Without the finding of prior aggravated felony, Jimenez would have faced a maximum sentence of 27 months, far below the actual sentence he received. We find no plain error and affirm the sentence. 2
I
Vicente Roberto Jimenez was indicted on January 19, 2000 and charged with violating 8…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Dewayne Bearchild v. Kristy CobbanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Rene Jaimes-JaimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales , Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Ruiz-GeaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Tony SiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.