Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Kirk v. Schindler Elevator Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 10, 2015No. 05-Cv-2917 (SHS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge.
Daniel Kirk, a Vietnam veteran and former employee of defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation, has brought this action pursuant to the qui tam provisions of. the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., alleging that Schindler, a government contractor, submitted false reports to the federal government in violation of the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act (“VEVRAA”), 38 *868U.S.C; § 4212. VEVRAA requires that contractors who do business with the fed-' eral government- submit annual reports to the Secretary of Labor (the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Robinson v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Chen-Cheng Wang, AKA C.C. Wang, an Individual and Ex Rel. The United States of America v. Fmc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sheldon v. Forest Laboratories, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Sheldon v. Forest Laboratories, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- United States v. Spectrum Painting Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020