Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Killian
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 16, 2012No. Docket 10-4651-prPublishedCited by 579 opinions
1Per curiam
The question before us is whether the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Naomi Reice Buchwald, Judge) properly granted summary judgment to defendants-appellees Warden Killian, Rabbi Laskin, and Case Manager Wynkoop 1 (jointly, “defendants”) based on its finding that plaintiff-appellant Neil Johnson failed to exhaust his administrative remedies through the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (the “PLRA”).
Johnson, pro se and incarcerated, appeals the final judgment of the District Court entered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by579 opinions
- Nick's Garage, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Torrey F. Wilcox v. Betty BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Nieblas-Love v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Borley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
574 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.