Legal Opinion
All Hawaii Tours, Corp. v. Polynesian Cultural Center
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided August 14, 1987No. Civ. No. 85-1490PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER DETERMINING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
PENCE, Senior District Judge.
On May 13, 1987, this court entered its order granting summary judgment to defendant as to Count I of the complaint, and dismissing Counts II and III. A final judgment in favor of defendant was entered on May 14, 1987. On May 29, 1987, plaintiff filed a thirty-five page motion to alter or amend this court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment, supported by six exhibits. Plaintiff brought this motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b) and Fed.R.*648Civ.P. 59(e). Plaintiff also…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. KerstingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Leong v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1988
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.