Nieuwenhuis v. Kelly
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.
Petitioner Sonny J. Nieuwenhuis seeks special action relief from the trial court’s sentencing order, entered after petitioner’s failure to qualify for the shock incarceration program, one of the conditions of his sentence of intensive probation. Because Nieuwenhuis has no equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal, Rule 1, Ariz.R.P. Spec. Actions, 17B A.R.S., we accept jurisdiction and grant relief in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 20, 1990, Nieuwenhuis was sentenced to a three-year term of intensive probation following his conviction of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. StottsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Green v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Burton v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- In Re the Appeal in Pinal County, Juvenile Action No. J-169Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. KorzuchArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. QuintanaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-503009Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. BradleyArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GatlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.