Legal Opinion
Gantz v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1974No. 3 April Term 1974, Docket No. 55,156PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The issue before this Court, specifically reserved for consideration in Williams v Detroit Civil Service Commission, 383 Mich 507, 513; 176 NW2d 593 (1970), is whether the Civil Service Commission has power to enforce its residency rule by vacating the position of a civil service employee who violates that rule.
I —FACTS
Plaintiff was in 1971 an analyst for the City of Detroit’s controller’s office. Such employees are required to live within the city pursuant to Civil Service Commission rule (Rule VII, § 2).1 The valid*354ity of this rule and the power of the commission to promulgate it was upheld…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Brady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Slavin v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Williams v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Delaney v. Detroit Board of Fire CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Wexford County Prosecutor v. PrangerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Turner v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Choike v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- City of Saginaw v. LindquistMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.