Legal Opinion

Wexford County Prosecutor v. Pranger

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1978No. Docket 77-2535PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, J.

This case involves interpretation of the Open Meetings Act of 1977.1

At the regular meeting of May 9, 1977, the Cadillac City Commission recessed and held a closed meeting to discuss the city residency policy for city employees. The closed meeting, which lasted slightly over an hour, was held at the request of the city manager with the approval of the city attorney. Then the commission resumed in open meeting, announced a new residency policy and indicated an ordinance would be formulated to implement the policy.

In 1967, the city had adopted a residency policy which permitted municipal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rockwell v. Crestwood School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Dearborn Fire Fighters Union Local No 412 v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Pontiac Police Officers Ass'n v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. San Diego Union v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Dewey v. Redevelopment Agency of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Delaware Solid Waste Authority v. News-Journal Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. VanDeventer v. Michigan National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API