In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 224-226, 228, State Questions Nos. 314-316, 318
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Secretary of State holding the above mentioned initiative petitions sufficient and valid. The petitions were protested by J. M. Ash-ton, and after the appeal was lodged in this court the matter was referred to one of the Referees with directions to hear the evidence, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and return the same to the court, together with the transcript of the evidence and the proceedings had before him. The petitions called for the submission to the voters of the state for adoption or rejection of amendments to the Constitution…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 176, Etc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- In Re State Question No. 236, Referendum Petition No. 73Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 196, Etc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Oklahomans for Modern Alcoholic Beverage Controls, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 272, State Question No. 409Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- In Re Referendum Petition No. 18, State Ques. No. 437Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 317, Etc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.