Legal Opinion

Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 2015No. 120506486; A153170PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

Plaintiff, the insured, appeals a general judgment in favor of defendant, Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs claim for breach of contract. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The material facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff was insured under a motor vehicle insurance policy issued by defendant. As statutorily required, plaintiffs insurance policy included personal injury protection (PIP) coverage, which is Oregon’s version of “no fault” motor vehicle insurance.1 Under the PIP statutory scheme, when an insured…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Force v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Bialostosky v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API