Legal Opinion

Bayle v. South Carolina Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 8, 2001No. 3284PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

Joel Bayle, as Personal Representative for Patricia Bayle, initiated these actions for survival and wrongful death. Bayle appeals the grant of summary judgment to the South Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT). The court ruled Bayle’s actions were barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Patricia Bayle was killed on October 12,1994, when she lost control of her vehicle as she drove into a large amount of standing water in the northbound lane of 1-85. Bayle’s car crossed the median and struck an oncoming tractor-trailer in the southbound…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Redwend Ltd. Partnership v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API