Suburban Development Corp. v. Perryman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
We granted certiorari in this case to consider the apparent conflict between Maryland Rule 625 a, which gives the circuit court a thirty-day revisory power over its pre-enrolled judgments, and sections 112 and 113 of Article 81 of the Maryland Code (1957, 1975 Repl. Vol.), which declare that tax sale foreclosure decrees shall, except for fraud or lack of jurisdiction, be conclusive. However, we do not reach this question (as the Court of Special Appeals should not have in Perryman v. Suburban Dev. Corp., 33 Md. App. 589, 365 A. 2d 570 (1976)), since an inspection of the record reveals that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Turner v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Kneas v. Hecht CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Owen v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Acting Director, Department of Forests & Parks v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Suter v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Canaj, Inc. v. Baker and Division Phase IIICourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Haskell v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Hardy v. MettsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.