Legal Opinion
Canaj, Inc. v. Baker and Division Phase III
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 6, 2006No. 72, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCathell, J.
Between March 14, 2003, and June 29, 2004, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City foreclosed Canaj, Inc.’s (appellant) right of redemption to a number of properties sold at a tax sale on August 8, 2001. Appellant had moved to dismiss the foreclosure proceedings as to only two of the properties, 523 Senker Place and 2300 Brunt Street. It filed no prejudgment motions to dismiss as to any of the other of its properties. As to those two properties only, the foreclosure actions were dismissed by express agreement of the parties.
After having failed to file any prejudgment motions to dismiss in…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Holland v. Big River Minerals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Thompson v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- In re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Corp. v. YanniCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- In Re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.