Legal Opinion

Kyle v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 15, 1993No. CR 92-1107PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a circuit court retains jurisdiction over a defendant who has been ordered to pay restitution as a condition of a deferred imposition of sentence until the restitution has been paid in full, even beyond the duration of deferment. We hold that the trial court inherently retains jurisdiction over such a procedure until the full amount of restitution is paid, even if the term of the defendant has expired. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s decision to extend appellant’s probation period until her debt was paid.

On January…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Uilkie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Mears v. Arkansas State HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Gibson v. City of TrumannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Bunch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Arkansas County v. Desha CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Robert D. Holloway, Inc. v. Pine Ridge Addition Residential Property OwnersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API