Legal Opinion

Robert D. Holloway, Inc. v. Pine Ridge Addition Residential Property Owners

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 9, 1998No. 97-748PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

The constitutionality of Ark. Code Ann. § 14-94-127 (Repl. 1988) is the issue before us on appeal. The instant appeal challenges an order of the Pulaski County chancery court granting a motion for summary judgment and holding section 14-94-127 unconstitutional. Finding that the statute unconstitutionally delegates to the chancery court a solely legislative function, we affirm.

Appellant, Robert D. Holloway, Inc., an engineering firm in Maumelle, Arkansas, performed professional engineering services in a total amount of $247,811.06, on behalf of appellee Pine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Kyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. McLeod, Comm. of Rev. v. Santa Fe Trail Trans. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Quapaw Central Business Improvement District v. Bond-Kinman, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. McDougal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Doe v. BaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Harasyn v. St. Paul Guardian InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Chamberlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Short v. Westark Community CollegeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API