Commonwealth ex rel. Morgan v. Smith
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
The primary issue on this appeal is whether, in the absence of sufficient iegal evidence upon which to base a finding of paternity, a person, who maintained a meretricious relationship with the child’s mother, can be found liable for the support of the child because he stood “in loco parentis” to the child?
In August 1946, Elizabeth Brooks entered into a lawful marriage with Clarence Morgan, a marriage never legally dissolved. After living together for about *563four months, Morgan left his wife and disappeared.1 Of that marriage the record does not reveal affirmatively…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth ex rel. Morgan v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by59 opinions
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Spells v. SpellsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Butler v. IllesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Seger v. SegerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.