Arkansas Valley Nat. Bank v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pawnee County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action between the Arkansas Valley National Bank and E. M. Clark., From the judgment, the Bank brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The brief of plaintiff in error was filed on January 19, 1910; that of defendant in error on January 25, 1911. On May 1, 1911, plaintiff in error filed a reply brief. Counsel for defendant in error insist that the appeal should be dismissed, on the grounds that: (1) The brief contains no abstract or’ abridgment of the transcript covering the pleadings assailed in the petition in error; (2) that there is no index to any abstract; (3) that the instructions complained of are not set out in totidem verbis; and (4) that said brief contains no specifications of the errors complained of, separately…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seaver v. RulisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Roof v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. Public School District No. 44Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
3Cited by11 opinions
- E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Works v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- City of Duncan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Worrell v. FellowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Dickson v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- E. G. Rall Grain Co. v. First State Bank of McQueenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.