Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Lee

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 27, 2019No. 1:10-cv-01026Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GLEN CUMMINS, Petitioner, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. 10-CV-01026 (LDH) WILLIAM LEE, Respondent. LASHANN DEARCY HALL, United States District Judge: Petitioner Glen Cummins, proceeding pro se, petitions pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, the prosecutor engaged in misconduct, the trial court improperly charged the jury, and the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. (Pet. 4, ECF No. 1.) BACKGROUND1 This petition arises out of a judgment of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API