Warpar Manufacturing Corp. v. Ashland Oil, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
On July 9,1984, approximately six weeks before this protracted litigation was scheduled for trial on a bifurcated basis, the plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify defendants’ counsel, Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton and Norman (hereinafter GSFN), from further participation on behalf of defendants.
The motion for disqualification arises from a unique set of circumstances. Stated simply, it is the plaintiffs’ contention that the defense by GSFN of plaintiffs’ counsel in a malpractice action subsequently filed by the plaintiffs against plaintiffs’ counsel…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- The Nck Organization Ltd. And William E. Greene, Jr. v. Walter W. BregmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Wilson P. Abraham Construction Corporation v. Armco Steel Corporation, the Ceco Corporation, and Laclede Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Novo Terapeutisk Laboratorium A/s v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Gist-Brocades Fermentation Industries, Inc., and Gist-Brocades N. V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Buckley v. Airshield Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of Valley-Vulcan Mold Co. v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. (In Re Valley-Vulcan Mold Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.