Legal Opinion

Friends of the Crystal River v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 23, 1992No. 1:92:CV:325PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This case is before the Court on plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive and declaratory relief under counts I and III of their complaint. Pursuant to section 404(j) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344(j), plaintiffs challenge the legality of the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) decision to withdraw its longstanding objections to the State of Michigan issuing a “dredge and fill” permit to Kuras Properties, Inc. (Kuras) for the purpose of constructing an 18-hole golf course at the Homestead Resort adjacent to the Sleeping Bear…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Yakima v. Surface Transportation BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1999
  2. Friends Of The Crystal River v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Friends of the Crystal River v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API