Legal Opinion

Boruff v. Jesseph

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1991No. 32A01-9102-CV-28PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

This appeal asks us to determine whether the word "battery" is a magic talisman which automatically removes a patient's complaint against a health care provider from the purview of the Medical Malpractice Act (the Act).1 We hold that it is not, and therefore affirm the trial court's dismissal of this action.

Plaintiff-appellant Elizabeth Boruff consulted defendant-appellee Jerry Jesseph, M.D. for treatment of a rectal fistula. Dr. Jesseph recommended surgery. According to the complaint, Boruff and her husband, plaintiff-appellant William Boruff, told Dr. Jesseph that he alone was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kranda v. Houser-Norborg Medical Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Collins v. ThakkarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Revord Ex Rel. Revord v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Kranda v. HOUSER-NORBORG MEDICAL CORPORATIONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Cullen v. WildmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Vitale v. HencheyKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Doe Ex Rel Roe v. Madison Center HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Van Sice v. SentanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Popovich v. DanielsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API