Boruff v. Jesseph
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
This appeal asks us to determine whether the word "battery" is a magic talisman which automatically removes a patient's complaint against a health care provider from the purview of the Medical Malpractice Act (the Act).1 We hold that it is not, and therefore affirm the trial court's dismissal of this action.
Plaintiff-appellant Elizabeth Boruff consulted defendant-appellee Jerry Jesseph, M.D. for treatment of a rectal fistula. Dr. Jesseph recommended surgery. According to the complaint, Boruff and her husband, plaintiff-appellant William Boruff, told Dr. Jesseph that he alone was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kranda v. Houser-Norborg Medical Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Collins v. ThakkarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Revord Ex Rel. Revord v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kranda v. HOUSER-NORBORG MEDICAL CORPORATIONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cullen v. WildmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Vitale v. HencheyKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Doe Ex Rel Roe v. Madison Center HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Van Sice v. SentanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Popovich v. DanielsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.