Legal Opinion
Popovich v. Danielson
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 2008No. 64A03-0804-CV-146PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Patricia Popovich appeals the dismissal of her complaint against Dr. John R. Dan-ielson. Because the Medical Malpractice Act governs three of Popovich’s claims, she needed to obtain an opinion from a medical review panel prior to filing her complaint, and the trial court properly determined it lacked jurisdiction over those claims. Po-povich’s fourth claim, for fraud, was insufficiently specific for us to determine whether it falls under the Malpractice Act; as such it did not meet the pleading requirement of Trial Rule 9(B). Accordingly, the trial court properly dismissed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Collins v. ThakkarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Abbott v. BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wayne County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals v. United Ancient Order of Druids-Grove 29Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Kho v. PenningtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Van Sice v. SentanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Billie Thompson v. Lance CopeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Howard Regional Health System v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Shacare Terry v. Community Health Network, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Preferred Professional Ins. Co., and Hills Ins. Co. Inc. v. Crystal West, William West, and Ind. Dept. of Ins., Patient's Comp. FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- B.R. ex rel. Todd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.