Legal Opinion

Vitale v. Henchey

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2000No. 1998-SC-1035-DG, 1998-SC-1077-DGPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLER, Justice.

I. ISSUES

These combined appeals present two primary issues.

Henchey, Sallee’s Administrator, introduced proof at trial that Dr. Vitale operated on Sallee twice although Henchey, then acting as Sallee’s medical power of attorney, had only consented for Drs. Wieman and Sparrow to do so. Henchey introduced no proof that this substitution of surgeons violated the accepted standard of medical care, and for this reason, the trial court directed a verdict against Henchey on the issue of liability. Was Henchey required to prove a violation of the accepted standard of medical care?…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Miller v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Holton v. PfingstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
  5. Boruff v. JessephIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United Specialty Ins. Co. v. Cole's Place, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Banks v. FritschCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  4. Wendy Browning v. Edmonson Cnty., Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. Combs v. ICG Hazard, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API