Legal Opinion

Kranda v. HOUSER-NORBORG MEDICAL CORPORATION

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1981No. 3-480A107PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Kranda petitions this court for rehearing, 419 N.E.2d 1024, raising, among other things, our failure to address a claimed error in the refusal of her tendered instruction numbered four (4).

This instruction specifically set out the physician’s duty to keep abreast of progress and modern methods of diagnosis and treatment and that failure to do so, which results in injury, could permit liability to be imposed upon that physician. Kranda generally argues that this instruction is a correct statement of the law. Accepting this as true, it presents no question…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dahlberg v. OgleIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kranda v. Houser-Norborg Medical Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Sargent, Admrx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Summit Bank v. PanosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Boruff v. JessephIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Fendley v. FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Spaulding v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Husted v. McCloudIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API