Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Holmay

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1991No. C6-86-1442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes to us for disposition based on the referee’s report finding that respondent Jerome J. Holmay practiced law while on restricted status; that he misrepresented his compliance with rules governing restricted status practice to the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility; and that he procured improper notarizations on documents. These findings are deemed conclusive as no transcript of the referee’s hearing has been ordered. Rule 14(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The referee recommends indefinite suspension with a minimum of 3…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. In Re the Discipline of IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Matter of Discipline of DannaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In Re the Discipline of FinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Matter of Discipline of BernsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against LallierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. People v. BarringerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API