Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Probate Div.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1995No. 1995-0896PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 19.] THE STATE EX REL. LIPINSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, PROBATE DIVISION, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Probate Div.,

1995-Ohio-96.] Prohibition to prevent probate court from exercising jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment action—Writ denied, when. (No. 95-896—Submitted September 26, 1995—Decided November 1, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 68188. __________________ {¶ 1} In February 1991,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Wozniak v. WozniakOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Corron v. CorronOhio Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. MaloneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. StansellOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cty. Probate CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Lee v. Trumbull Cty. Probate CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API