Legal Opinion

Moore v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1984No. B001666PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Ruby Gross Moore appeals from the denial of her petition, under Government Code section 946.6, 1 for relief from the requirements of section 945.4, which makes presentation of a claim a prerequisite to suit against, in this case, the State of California (the state). The circumstances of this case are unusual if not unprecedented: Ms. Moore filed a timely claim for damages for her injuries but was required to follow the Govern ment Code’s procedures for late claims after the lawsuit based upon her timely, rejected claim was dismissed on the grounds that that claim did not…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Hernandez v. GarcettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. DeVore v. Department of the California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Garber v. City of ClovisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  5. Powell v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API