Crow v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Charles Crow filed a multicount complaint naming as defendants the State of California, California State University Sacramento (CSUS) and its trustees, as well as other individual and fictitious defendants. The public entity defendants, whom we shall collectively refer to as CSUS, successfully moved for summary judgment. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment dismissing his complaint as to CSUS. We shall affirm.
The Pleadings and Summary Judgment Motion
Although this is an appeal from a summary judgment motion, the material facts are not in dispute. Thus,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- The Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Nero v. Kansas State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Avila v. Citrus Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.