Legal Opinion

Department of Social Services Ex Rel. Wolf v. McCarty

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1993No. 17897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

Via a complaint filed August 7, 1990, Ros-lea Ann Wolf (Wolf) alleged that Appellant Robert R. McCarty (McCarty) was the father of E.V.W., born to Appellee Wolf on April 4, 1990. A January 7, 1992 jury trial found McCarty to be E.V.W.’s father. Thereafter, the trial court established McCarty’s child support obligations and awarded attorney fees to the state’s attorney representing the Department of Social Services on behalf of Wolf. On appeal, McCarty raises two issues:

I. Did the trial court err in refusing to allow evidence of McCarty’s sterility?

II…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Corbly v. MathesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. WimberlySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks DepartmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Davi v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. LoftusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Grajczyk v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API