Legal Opinion
United States Cellular Investment Co. of Allentown v. Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided May 29, 1996No. 326, 1995PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice.
In this appeal from the Court of Chancery, we are required to examine the timeliness of an action for breach of a limited partnership agreement. The plaintiff-appellant, United States Cellular Investment Company of Allentown (“USCIC”), is a limited partner in the Allentown SMSA 1 Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”). USCIC sued the general partner, Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown, Inc. (with its affiliated companies, referred to herein as “BAMS”), for breach of the limited partnership agreement (the “Agreement”) and breach of fiduciary duty. Specifically, USCIC…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Adams v. JankouskasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Wright v. ScottonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923
- Ewing v. BeckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- Continental Insurance v. Rutledge & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
- Reid v. SpazioSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Harold Kraft v. Wisdomtree Investments, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
- Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips ElectronicsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.