Legal Opinion

Meek v. Unocal Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1996No. S-6462PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The issues in this workers’ compensation case are whether Meek may claim permanent total disability benefits after requesting reemployment benefits, and whether the statute and regulation defining remunerative employability are constitutional. The Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board held that Meek was not entitled to permanent total disability benefits, but declined to address the constitutional issues. On appeal, the superior court affirmed the benefits decision, and held that the statute and regulation are constitutional. We affirm the superior court’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Vetter v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rydwell v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Williams v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Leigh v. Seekins FordAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cornelison v. TIG InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API