Legal Opinion
Molybdenum Corp. of America v. Kasey
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1959No. Civ. 5930PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an action for declaratory relief wherein both parties seek clarification of a dispute over their rights in certain unpatented mining claims in the Clark Mountain Mining District of San Bernardino County. Both parties have appealed.
From the record before us it appears that during the years 1924 to 1950, 13 unpatented lode mining claims were located by plaintiff’s (hereinafter called Company) predecessors in interest in the area with which we are concerned. Twelve of these claims (hereinafter referred to as Sulphide Queen claims) bear the names Sulphide Queen Numbers 1 and 2; Lead…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Garvey v. LashellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Kasey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- J. Bryant Kasey and Mary Ann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Bank of California v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.