Legal Opinion
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Foust Distilling Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 12, 1952No. 3008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff (RFC) as transferee1 of Defense Supplies Corporation (DSC) seeks from defendant distiller, a Pennsylvania corporation, simple damages for breach of contract; treble damages for violation of maximum price regulations and refund orders, reasonable attorney’s fees, interest and costs, by virtue of a violation of § 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 925(e).
Upon denial of its motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint2 defendant filed an answer and counterclaim. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment on the complaint,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Foust Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Sherwood Distilling Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1952
- Sherwood Distilling Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952