Legal Opinion

Isaiah v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1959No. 4896PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.

In this appeal on questions of law, the appellant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, herein called “company,” seeks to have a judgment against it reversed because of the following claimed errors:

“1. The Court of Common Pleas erred in overruling the motions of defendant for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
“2. The Court of Common Pleas erred in the general charge to the jury.
“3. The verdict and judgment are contrary to law and against the weight of the evidence. ’ ’

John Isaiah entered a supermarket of the company, wearing an army-issue raincoat with large…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hughes v. OrebCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Muniz v. MehlmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Smith v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McAleer v. GoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Fox v. McCurninSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Uebelacker v. Cincom Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Terry v. Zions Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Walsh v. Erie County Department of Job & Family ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  4. Mullins v. Rinks, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Roberts v. Hecht Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API