Legal Opinion
Millar v. James
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 1967No. Civ. 30395PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment for the restitution of real property which she had been fraudulently induced to convey. Plaintiff is appealing from the judgment insofar as it fails to make an award against the defendants Helen James and Crete Dye for the use of the property and as exemplary damages.
The trial was by the court sitting without a jury. The findings of fact reflect the following:
On June 19, 1962, defendants, by means of fraudulent misrepresentation, induced plaintiff to sign an agreement to sell her property to defendant James for a price of $45,000, of which $12.000 was to be paid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Topanga Corp. v. GentileCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Gatje v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Debra Ackerman v. Western Electric Company, Inc., a Corporation, Debra Ackerman v. Western Electric Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Sheldon F. Sackett, and Kvan, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. J. Frank Beaman, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Esparza v. SpechtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Horn v. Guaranty Chevrolet MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Scheherezade Sharabianlou v. KarpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.